I see on screen shows that I am doing that. If my character is weak and slow, I must still be able to inflict massive damage by a well placed arrow/hit, if the animation Physical realism and the ability to control my character, and not be the victim of my stats. Rpg elements are very important but first of all, I want to see
Bedhesda has the resources and creativity to be able to surpass Mount and Blade: Warband combat. In Mount and Blade: Warband, any human opponent falls dead after at most 6 hits, and that is only when he is very heavily armored. In Oblivion, I hit like ten times to a goblin with a steel sword, see that I hit its head and many other parts, and all that happens It would be good if Bedhesda can find a way to make combat more realistic in Skyrim. Close combat in Oblivion frustrated me because of the lack of control and timing in blocks and attacks. Because in any fight, bows will always be better than throwing weapons for a range unit.I played Oblivion again after many years after playing Mount and Blade: Warband. And I think that's the use of throwing weapons, a preemptive strike from the infantry. Before engaging to the fight and completely wrecking anyone, they already can deal damage to weaken the front line. Just look at the Huscarls, they have a one handed weapon, a shield, and a throwing weapon. However, throwing weapons are not meant to be used by a dedicated range unit. Plus, if the army somehow is still alive and reached the wall, crossbowmen are generally decent in melee combats and well-equipped with armors. Then you have crossbows for defensive sieges because their high damage combined with a decent number of xbowmen will destroy any army before reaching the walls (except the Huscarls, they're the mongols of Warband). You have bows for open field battle where you can use your shield wall to defend your back line. The way I see it, they all have their specific usage.
0 kommentar(er)
